Gender and Traditionalism
Gender and Traditionalism
A retort to William "Aristos" Gray's "Tradionalism and Gender"[1]
Harold "Eromenos" White
I must confess that Aristos's writing style is admirable, though his content itself leaves much to be desired. It is also with much regret that I feel this way, for it is no lighthearted matter when two fellow Aryans are at odds. Though we Great White Titans of the Earth have oft quarrelled, we may only hope those days are long behind us, and so it is with many amicable feelings I write specifically at Aristos himself now. The history of we Hyperboreans shows that despite the harsh cold of the climate, two men may forge much warmth betwixt themselves, and from that warmth civilisation itself shall spring forth unto the world.
Aristos asserts the Nuclear Family throughout his paper, and it is astonishing to me that one who seems so enlightened can be so led astray as to lay his faith in this blatantly Semitic invention. The Nuclear Family stems from the Christian (Jewish) idea of a man's sexual and romantic appetites being confined to one woman. If we are to accomplish all we desire for our people, then I would think it obvious we cannot allow ourselves to be held back by these Hebrew devices. The natural Pagan religions of Europa bequeath great sexual liberty unto her children, our old gods hold us to no standards except our duty to the White race, therefore we are given ample freedom to largely do as we please, so long as it is for the benefit of the Aryan people. I find it in poor taste and ungrateful to waste the generous bounty of gifts our gods have bestowed upon us. To make love to many women is profitable by providing more children for the race, and to make love to men has it's morale benefits as well. I would assert that Odin himself has likely made love to men before, and would encourage all of his sons to do so as well. The Sacred Band of Thebes performed unparalleled in combat because it's ranks were filled with lovers. How might one let some Turkic Persian defile he who you have shared your bed with many a night? Perhaps if the Third Army had been constructed in such a manner, the war may have gone quite differently.
I leave you with these thoughts, Aristos, for I am quite certain the Hellenic fire that burned in the loins of the ancients likely burns in you as well.
[1] https://folkishcredo.blogspot.com/2020/09/traditionalism-and-gender.html
I believe your ideas to be quite profound and deeply rooted in our racial essence and some of them particularly consonant with mine. However, I have to radically deviate with you on some of your points, especially that of the morality of homosexuality.
ReplyDeleteI personally am quite perplexed that those that could most accurately be called Aryan Traditionalists or Evolian Aryanists tend to also sanction and even edify homosexual act, and that only with a paltry of historical instantiations, most notably in Greece and Rome. I have a bilateral reservation against this assertion: one regarding the prevalence and integrity of homosexuality in said nations of antiquity and the other regarding the overlooking of how homosexuality was perceived amongst other Indo-European nations. The former would entail great unraveling that would be too much for a reflective comment but to encapsulate, homosexuality was not a prevalent practice in neither Rome nor Greece but rather elite practices that have little historical evidence to back it up with (other than some depictions on vases and pieces of literature). The whole narrative of the ancient tolerance of homosexuality is based on a few dozen of frescos and vessels. By my latter point I am implicitly pointing to the treatment of homosexuality amongst the Germanic peoples. In Germanic mythology, from Þrymskviða (Thor seething and remonstrating with his having to dress as Freyja) to Gylfaginning of the Prose Edda (The Æsir fretting to ask Loki the origin of Sleipnir), it is evident that men indulging in feminine practices like homosexuality is concieved of as nothing but culpable and wicked. Apart from mythology, we also know from the accounts of Tacitus that the in Germanic custom, "sodomites are pressed down under a wicker hurdle into the slimy mud of a bog". It is also mentioned that they were called Urnings.
I am merely extrapolating the human condition, in fact the condition of all life, which is fundamentally a struggle and triumph of the strong. Homosexuality is not only a subversion of the natural state of affairs and of our ultimate interest, but also our traditions as I have just tried to adumbrate above.
For the rest your concern resonates with me and it has more of a touch with the human condition than homosexuality. An adequate response would be too much to unfold in a comment but let me just clarify I am not completely against polygamy but instead I believe to have better reasons to adhere to monogamy and agree with MacDonald on praising the Catholic Church for enforcing monogamy.
Overall though I'd like to thank you for your rejoinder, I quite enjoyed the profluence. I look forward to greater cooperation in our cause. Feel free to contact me.
I'm very enthused to see you've replied, and I take both your praise and critique with joy and much thought. As you've said, comments are difficult to use with all the ease and content of both typical conversation and debate, and as Discord is my most frequent means of online talk I was curious if you had that and would be inclined to speak more there? I also look forward to greater cooperation in our cause, and I look forward to your reply.
DeleteExcuse me for the long overdue reply, I have been much preoccupied with more immediate matters. If you would like to still converse, you could contact me further from my gmail (metapolitean@gmail.com) or you could alternatively send me your Discord tag from there since I do use Discord, although sporadically now.
DeleteGig has been up a long time mate. Who were you, really? Contact me at my mail, I want to chat. I have a couple of questions.
ReplyDelete